Friday, September 30, 2011

Human at Fire: Spontaneous Human Combustion

Perhaps you should not mix smoking and drinking:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spontaneous_human_combustion
http://www.bmj.com/content/1/4041/1340.2.full.pdf
http://www.springerlink.com/content/l70867820t45u713/
http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/jclc42&div=113&id=&page=

Monday, September 26, 2011

Does Science Suck?

Hilarious. An article I read somewhere.

'The term "suck" originated in San Francisco and New York City of the late sixties. It was used as a critical description of the relative merit of rock bands. If a band used material or styles from other bands, they "sucked", or were derivative, un-original.
Thus science, being first-person perception derived from highly controlled observation, cannot "suck". Indeed, science is the very epitome of originality and creative thinking. Science attempts to establish real perception of fundamental realities.
Anyone who has experimented with psychedelic drugs knows exactly what I'm talking about. A drug-associated perception, or an hallucination, is a product of one's senses when altered to perceive a greater field of view than under normal circumstances, an artifact of one's own senses. Many mistakenly derive emotional turbulence through the perception of altered states and reacting accordingly, do themselves or others harm. These perceptions are "unreal".
Science, however, attempts to establish a truer reality, a more exact understanding, that while it mimics "expanded consciousness" insofar as expanding the perimeters of perception, attempts to correct misperception or misunderstanding and just plain ignorance. Science is therefore the very opposite of "suck". Not only does science avoid imitation of what has gone before, but science '.goes boldly where no mind has gone before..', and rejects unreality.
The scientific mind ignores the artifacts of perception itself, knowing that our perception can be limited and distorted, dogged by "groupthink", canonical dictates, the arbitrary winds of cultural approval. The scientist, then, is the true explorer, the true original thinker, and the best approximation of the truest perceiver.
Science rocks.
"The real reason science sucks is that it makes us look bad. It makes us bit players in the Big Story of the universe…. Look at it this way: Before science, we humans had dominion over Earth, the center of the universe. Now we're just a bunch of hairless apes on a wet rock orbiting a minor star in a marginal galaxy." ,

Archimedes

Sometimes recognition is not important, only your work is. It would be good to reach that stage like Archimedes..

An interesting article on Archimedes: http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/degrees-of-freedom/2011/09/20/archimedes-and-euclid-like-string-theory-versus-freshman-calculus/?WT_mc_id=SA_DD_20110920

Thursday, September 15, 2011

Interesting Articles

Swearing as a response to pain: http://scientopia.org/blogs/scicurious/2010/10/15/friday-weird-science-that-motherfking-hurts/

That irritating sound in your ear: Yang S, Weiner BD, Zhang LS, Cho SJ, & Bao S (2011). Homeostatic plasticity drives tinnitus perception in an animal model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108 (36), 14974-9 PMID: 21896771
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/scicurious-brain/2011/09/13/tingling-neurons-titillate-your-tinnitus/?WT_mc_id=SA_CAT_MB_20110914

Kropotikin and theory of social evolution: http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/primate-diaries/2011/09/13/prince-of-evolution/?WT_mc_id=SA_CAT_MB_20110914
http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100908/pdf/467146a.pdf


Awesome caption, Peacock Spider: http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/video-of-the-week/2011/09/14/peacock-spider/?WT_mc_id=SA_CAT_MB_20110914
 

Illusions

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=the-eyes-have-it&WT.mc_id=SA_CAT_MB_20110914

http://cvcl.mit.edu/hybrid_gallery/gallery.html

Is this body yours?

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=real-outof-body-experiences

Friday, September 2, 2011

How do you sleep?

http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/a-blog-around-the-clock/2011/08/29/everything-you-always-wanted-to-know-about-sleep-but-were-too-afraid-to-ask/?WT_mc_id=SA_DD_20110829